Something very interesting is happening in Denmark. So yet, the Danish firm for the production of fur garments class haute couture for dogs Chien Bizarre introduced advertising prints collection Fall / Spring 2011. Photoshoot photographer Leytorpa Flemming (Flemming Leitorp) participated Danish model Loba Stephanie (Stephanie Loba).
Looks Of course, luxurious. But there is a big "but" not one thing. Once in a regular dialogue with the Skype-
you personally think?
There are two points of view on this question, the principle of rational egoism and anthropocentrism.
Anthropocentrism believes the only human value, with all other living creatures can be totally ignored.
principle of reasonable selfishness comes from the fact that man is the supreme value, but not the only one. And one should not torture and inflict suffering on animals unnecessarily.
an illustration. A supporter of the principle of rational egoism would kill the animal before throw it into boiling water. Antropotsentrist will not zamorachivatsya and throw the animal into boiling water alive. He will not care that the animal will be able to agony.
I am personally of rational egoism. So, to get the precious fur from animals, humanity at the moment comes, on the contrary, according to the principle of anthropocentrism, ie sandpaper to remove the animals live and spend money by lulling believes it TPAT, and not humanity. Here is the awful footage http://animalsaviors.org
thought it would be nice to make a donation to the fund WWF. Someone did it?
There are two points of view on this question, the principle of rational egoism and anthropocentrism.
Anthropocentrism believes the only human value, with all other living creatures can be totally ignored.
principle of reasonable selfishness comes from the fact that man is the supreme value, but not the only one. And one should not torture and inflict suffering on animals unnecessarily.
an illustration. A supporter of the principle of rational egoism would kill the animal before throw it into boiling water. Antropotsentrist will not zamorachivatsya and throw the animal into boiling water alive. He will not care that the animal will be able to agony.
I am personally of rational egoism. So, to get the precious fur from animals, humanity at the moment comes, on the contrary, according to the principle of anthropocentrism, ie sandpaper to remove the animals live and spend money by lulling believes it TPAT, and not humanity. Here is the awful footage http://animalsaviors.org
thought it would be nice to make a donation to the fund WWF. Someone did it?
Upd: Judging by the comments, the conversation obviously did not go in that vein, let's not talk about my gaps in knowledge on philosophy, voles and chauvinism, but rather on the case.)
0 comments:
Post a Comment